On 19/06/2013,
you requested for the version in force on 19/06/2013
incorporating all amendments published on or before 19/06/2013.
The closest version currently available is that of 01/04/2006.
81ZJ.
—(1) Where the Authority is satisfied that an officer of an approved holding company —
(a)
has wilfully contravened or wilfully caused that approved holding company to contravene this Act;
(b)
has, without reasonable excuse, failed to ensure compliance with this Act by that approved holding company;
(c)
has failed to discharge the duties or functions of his office or employment;
(d)
is an undischarged bankrupt, whether in Singapore or elsewhere;
(e)
has had execution against him in respect of a judgment debt returned unsatisfied in whole or in part;
(f)
has, whether in Singapore or elsewhere, made a compromise or scheme of arrangement with his creditors, being a compromise or scheme of arrangement that is still in operation; or
(g)
has been convicted, whether in Singapore or elsewhere, of an offence involving fraud or dishonesty or the conviction for which involved a finding that he acted fraudulently or dishonestly,
the Authority may, if it thinks it necessary in the interests of the public or a section of the public or for the protection of investors, by notice in writing direct that approved holding company to remove the officer from his office or employment and that approved holding company shall comply with such notice, notwithstanding the provisions of section 152 of the Companies Act (Cap. 50).
[1/2005]
(2) Without prejudice to any other matter that the Authority may consider relevant, the Authority may, in determining whether an officer of an approved holding company has failed to discharge the duties or functions of his office or employment for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), have regard to such criteria as the Authority may prescribe or specify in directions issued by notice in writing.
[1/2005]
(3) Subject to subsection (4), the Authority shall not direct an approved holding company to remove an officer from his office or employment without giving the approved holding company an opportunity to be heard.
[1/2005]
(4) The Authority may direct an approved holding company to remove an officer from his office or employment under subsection (1) on any of the following grounds without giving the approved holding company an opportunity to be heard:
(a)
the officer is an undischarged bankrupt, whether in Singapore or elsewhere;
(b)
the officer has been convicted, whether in Singapore or elsewhere, of an offence —
(i)
involving fraud or dishonesty or the conviction for which involved a finding that he had acted fraudulently or dishonestly; and
(ii)
punishable with imprisonment for a term of 3 months or more.
[1/2005]
(5) Where the Authority directs an approved holding company to remove an officer from his office or employment under subsection (1), the Authority need not give that officer an opportunity to be heard.
[1/2005]
(6) Any approved holding company that is aggrieved by a direction of the Authority made in relation to the approved holding company under subsection (1) may, within 30 days after the approved holding company is notified of the direction, appeal to the Minister whose decision shall be final.
[1/2005]
(7) Notwithstanding the lodging of an appeal under subsection (6), any action taken by the Authority under this section shall continue to have effect pending the decision of the Minister.
[1/2005]
(8) The Minister may, when deciding an appeal under subsection (6), make such modification as he considers necessary to any action taken by the Authority under this section, and such modified action shall have effect from the date of the decision of the Minister.
[1/2005]
(9) Subject to subsection (10), no criminal or civil liability shall be incurred by an approved holding company in respect of any thing done or omitted to be done with reasonable care and in good faith in the discharge or purported discharge of its obligations under this section.
[1/2005]
(10) Any approved holding company which, without reasonable excuse, contravenes a written notice issued under subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $150,000 and, in the case of a continuing offence, to a further fine not exceeding $15,000 for every day or part thereof during which the offence continues after conviction.
[1/2005]