On 20/06/2013,
you requested for the version in force on 20/06/2013
incorporating all amendments published on or before 20/06/2013.
The closest version currently available is that of 01/05/2013.
5.
—(1) Without prejudice to Rule 3(2), where a person objects to answering any interrogatory on the ground of privilege, he may take the objection in his answer.
(2) Where any person, on whom ordered interrogatories have been served, answers any of them insufficiently, the Court may make an order requiring him to make a further answer, either by affidavit or on oral examination as the Court may direct.
(3) Where any person, on whom interrogatories without order have been served, answers any of them insufficiently, the party serving the interrogatories may ask for further and better particulars of the answer given and any such request shall not be treated as service of further interrogatories for the purposes of Rule 3(1).