

On 25/05/2013,
you requested for the version in force on 25/05/2013
incorporating all amendments published on or before 25/05/2013.
The closest version currently available is that of 01/05/2013.

7.
—(1) If, on an application under Rule 1, it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant relied on a contention which would entitle him to unconditional leave to defend, then, the Court may dismiss the application with costs.
(2) The Court shall have the same power to dismiss an application under Rule 5 as it has under paragraph (1) to dismiss an application under Rule 1, and that paragraph shall apply accordingly with the necessary modifications.
(3) If the Court dismisses an application under Rule 1 or gives a defendant against whom such an application is made unconditional leave to defend the action with respect to the claim or any part thereof to which the application relates, the Court may make such order as to costs against the plaintiff as it considers fit.
[S 504/2010 wef 15/09/2010]







